Skip to main content

Now is a good time to roll over your IRA to Roth IRA

You aren't smarter than the market. It really is that simple.

One of the interesting aspects of the recent collapse in stock values is that it makes it a good time to consider rolling your traditional IRA over into a Roth IRA and paying the taxes on the lower valued stock before they go back up. Of course, that assumes they will go back up before you retire.

For people who don't pay attention to this sort of thing, the basic difference between a Roth IRA and a traditional IRA is how you pay taxes on them.

With the traditional IRA you put your money in an account for retirement and you don't have to pay any taxes on it. Or, looked at another way, you can deduct the contribution from your income taxes. You also don't have to pay taxes on any of the earnings from the investment while they accrue. But when you go to take money out of that account, you have to pay income taxes on the money you withdraw just as you would any other income you had earned. So, while you save money in the short run, you are fully taxed on both your investment and any earnings when you take the money out. And, with a traditional IRA, you are required to start taking the money out so you can't avoid paying taxes forever.

The Roth IRA works basically in reverse. You pay taxes on the money before you put it into the account. You don't have to pay any taxes on any earnings as they accrue. And you don't have to pay any more taxes on either the principal or the earnings when you withdraw them in retirement. There is also no required withdrawal, so they can go on generating tax free income the rest of your life.

Generally speaking, and the devil is in the details, you are better off with the Roth IRA if you expect your nominal tax rate to be as high or higher in retirement as it is now. Of course, none of us really know what our tax rate will be in retirement. That will be based on a bunch of factors, including decisions by people we elect in the future. For that reason, there are people who argue that you should have "tax diversity" with some money in Roth accounts and some in traditional IRA's (or 401K's which are similar to the traditional IRA in how they are taxed). But the general argument, that Roth is likely to be a better deal if the market goes up remains true.

Why does this matter? Because most people can roll investments they made in a traditional IRA over into a Roth IRA. But they have to come up with the money to pay the taxes. And, that money can't come out of the money being rolled over without paying early withdrawal penalties on it.

So assume, like me, you have $10,000 in a traditional IRA and a nominal tax rate of 25%. If you roll that $10,000 over into a Roth IRA now, next year you will owe an additional $2500 in income taxes. So does spending $2500 now pay off? Lets look at three scenarios:

1) Your investments have zero return:

IRA 10,000 - taxes paid upon withdrawal $2500.
Roth 10,000 - taxes paid now $2500.

This is essentially a wash, although the IRA has the "advantage" that you can pay those taxes out of the money as you take it out. I put quotes around "advantage" because this seeming advantage also means you have less money to spend in retirement. That extra $2500 you use to pay taxes on the Roth now can also be looked at as additional retirement savings.

2) Your investments return 10%: (this gets trickier)

IRA 10,000 + $1,000 earnings. Taxes due on withdrawal $2750.
You also would make another $250 with a 10% return from investing the $2500 saved by not paying rollover taxes. But those earnings are taxed - taxes on earnings $62.50
Net to spend in retirement: 10,937.50 after taxes.

Roth $10,000 + $1000 earnings (no taxes)
Net to spend in retirement: $11,000 after taxes.

Of course, 10% isn't a great total return for a long term investment. What happens if you leave the money there for 20 years and it doubles in value?

IRA 10,000 investment + $10,000 earnings. Taxes due on withdrawal $5000.
You also would make another $2500 with a 100% return from investing the $2500 saved by not paying rollover taxes. But those earnings are taxed - taxes on earnings $625.
Net: 19,375 after taxes.

Roth $10,000 + $10000 earnings -
Net: $20,000 after taxes.

But what if you don't invest the $2500 you saved on taxes? Then you have considerably less to spend in retirement:

Net IRA - $15,000 after taxes.

So, it pays to roll over if you are still paying the same tax rate on income when you retire. On the other hand, if your nominal tax rate drops to 15% at retirement, you may be better off waiting. But only if you invest the money you save on taxes. Otherwise you will still have less money when you retire if you leave your money in the IRA.

But what happens if your investments LOSE money? Then you are almost certainly better off leaving your money in the IRA. And that brings us to the reason many people think now is a good time to make the rollover. Because the value of most IRA accounts has dropped dramatically their value is at a low point and the taxes on the rollover will be lower. Some people also believe that today's low stock values will mean higher returns in the future and, as we saw above, the higher the total return on your investment the greater the tax advantages of the Roth IRA.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who is to blame for this mess?

There seems to be a lot of discussion to who is to blame for the financial crisis. But an awful lot of the media coverage is highly misleading. Here is synopis: 1) The meltdown in the financial market had little to do with people getting mortgages they couldn't afford. The collapse of the mortgage backed CDO's was caused by the collapse in the value of the houses which provided the collateral. It turned the mortgages behind the "collateralized debt obligations" (CDO's) into mostly un-collateralized debts. The result was that they went from AAA rated bonds to junk. 2)So what caused the housing bubble and collapse? Many people blame the fed, but don't have the story right. The fed did play a role. By keeping interest rates on Treasury Bonds low, they provided a market for alternative bonds that would pay a greater return. But the major cause of the housing bubble was the creativity of the investment banks. These are not the retail banks that make home mortgages

The Stock Market hasn't gone up, the Value of the Dollar has Just Gone Down.

You aren't smarter than the market. It really is that simple. The New York Times had an article about the stock market's recent gains. The story noted that while the market had gone up 11% since the election, the dollar had dropped 10% against a basket of foreign currencies during that same period. They described this as "almost a mirror image." Unfortunately it is exactly a mirror image for people who hold those foreign currencies. Lets say they paid a $100 for a share of stock the day of the election and they exchanged 100 units of their own currency for that $100. Now if they sell that stock they will get $111 dollars, but when they exchange that $111 dollars, they will get back 100 units of their own currency. They have earned nothing, in their own local currency's terms the price hasn't changed. In a world investment market, the price of stock is set by what people around the world are willing to pay for it. Most people are still paying the same pr

Self-Directed Real Estate IRA's the New Scam?

You aren't smarter than the market. It really is that simple. You know the marketing folks have been out talking when the New York Times does a fluff story on some new way to make more money with your investments. So watch out for the new scam promoted by the same media advisers who told you a few years ago to buy the most expensive house a lender would finance. Paul Sullivan story is about people'e successful investment of their retirement money in real estate using a self-directed IRA. He provides us with several "success stories".  Of course they are all recent converters to this idea and, not surprising, all but one of the people whose story Sullivan tells are also in real estate sales. The problem isn't really Paul Sullivan. Its that there is no one who makes money by digging out the horror stories from people who invested their retirement funds in real estate at the height of the housing bubble. There aren't any public relations firms devoted to de