Skip to main content

Walking Away from Your Mortgage

You aren't smarter than the market. It really is that simple.

The BBC has a story about how home owners who find themselves under water, owning more on their house than it is worth, are simply walking away. In most states, they have no obligation beyond what the bank gets from foreclosure. The result is that people who can still afford the payment are making a business decision to simply let the bank take the loss.

Housing prices are continuing to fall. There are some predictions that the ultimate floor on prices may be less than 50% of a home's peak value during the bubble. That means even people who bought with hefty down payments may find themselves owing more than they own. In addition, the premium for owning your own home over the cost of renting went up with the bubble and still hasn't come down again. So in many places, most people who own could rent some place similar for less money.

So does walking away make sense? If you look at it as purely a financial decision, it probably does. You will take a hit to your credit record. But unless you plan to borrow again in the next five years that may not matter very much. You are probably better off investing the money you save from renting than continuing to make payments on a asset which is declining in value.

On the other hand. A house is a place to live, not an investment. So whether to bail out is more a life decision than a financial one. Do you like where you live? Can you find a place you like as well. Will your kids need to change schools? In other words, how much is your current house worth to you? If it was worth the payments when you bought it, then it is likely still worth that to you now. If you plan to live in your house until the mortgage is paid off, it probably doesn't matter very much what the current market value is.

But many people chose a house for its investment value as much as a place to live. They didn't buy the house because they wanted to retire there, they bought it with the expectation that they would sell it and move up in a few years. If you are one of those people, don't stay trapped. The sooner you bail out, the more money you will save and the quicker you will recover financially.

One thing from the BBC article I would like to highlight:

"This is becoming a tsunami of voluntary defaults," Professor Roubini says.

"The losses for the financial system from people walking away could be of the order of one trillion dollars when the entire capital of the US banking system is only $1.3 trillion.

"You could have most of the US banking system wiped out, so this is a total disaster."

That is a stark warning. But, in capitalist America, that is the way the system works. Better that they take the loss than that you do. When they loaned you the money secured by the house you were buying, the lenders understood that they were sharing the risk you took in buying that house.


Popular posts from this blog

Self-Directed Real Estate IRA's the New Scam?

You aren't smarter than the market. It really is that simple. You know the marketing folks have been out talking when the New York Times does a fluff story on some new way to make more money with your investments. So watch out for the new scam promoted by the same media advisers who told you a few years ago to buy the most expensive house a lender would finance. Paul Sullivan story is about people'e successful investment of their retirement money in real estate using a self-directed IRA. He provides us with several "success stories".  Of course they are all recent converters to this idea and, not surprising, all but one of the people whose story Sullivan tells are also in real estate sales. The problem isn't really Paul Sullivan. Its that there is no one who makes money by digging out the horror stories from people who invested their retirement funds in real estate at the height of the housing bubble. There aren't any public relations firms devoted to de

How Safe is Gold?

As often happens when the markets are bouncing up and down, some people are turning to the "safe haven" of gold. But how safe is gold? Gold has several attributes that make it attractive: 1) Gold is durable. In fact, some of the gold you buy today was probably mined by the Inca's thousands of years ago. 2) Gold is universal. With very few exceptions, gold always has value. This is true historically. And no matter where you go today you can likely trade gold for other goods either directly or by converting it into the local currency. 3) Gold is portable. While heavy, gold packs a lot of value in a small package. 4) Gold is beautiful. You can store it as jewelry or other decorative art. So if you are looking for an investment that will last a 1000's of years and still hold value, gold is a great commodity. Or if you are looking for something that will be likely to survive a complete societal breakdown like a war. However, when you start to look at likely fin

The T-Party Movement and Running Government Like a Business

There is a media narrative out there about the T-party that it is made up of people who are angry because they lost their jobs or fear losing their jobs. The actual demographics of T-party supporters don't really reflect this at all. Instead, the typical T-party adherent is male, moderately well to do and in his 40's. Of course, not all fit that demographic. But far from being "trailer trash" as some people imagine, the T-party folks have been relatively successful. So why are they angry? Because they fear life is getting worse, rather than better. And they, as individuals, react psychologically to their fears by getting angry, as opposed to other extreme of going to bed and pulling the covers over their head. But to focus on the causes of their anger, which are mostly personal psychology, is to ignore the causes of their fear. Of course, we can't expect politicians or the media to address those causes. Success in politics requires validating that fear and ang