Skip to main content

Is Lawrence Yun Really an Economist?

You aren't smarter than the market. It really is that simple.

----------
Update:

Here is an article about Yun's predecessor essentially admitting his job was "spin".
-------------
Is Lawrence Yun, the Chief Economist for the National Association of Realtors, really an economist? No, I don't mean does he have a degree and training in economics. I assume that he does. The question is what services of an economist does the National Association of Realtors provide.

In case you haven't noticed Yun before, it seems every time there is an article about the housing market in the New York Times, Associated Press and other media, Yun appears with his usually rosy prognosis of the future of real estate. That is not surprising, given who he works for, but it is not really the job of an economist. Its the role of a PR flak who is delivering the message that suits his employers. I suspect the job title of "economist" is also a part of that message. Afterall, identifying himself as a "spokesperson" for the Realtors would alert people to the self-serving nature of the opinion he is providing.

Unfortunately, this is the nature of much of the economic information we get from the mainstream media. Economists are generally employed by institutions with an interest in certain economic behavior. Even those in the academic world work in departments whose success depends on contributions and grants from institutions with an interest in their work. Its not that economists or economic departments conciously slant their analysis to serve particular outcomes, but that those whose natural bias supports the wealthy are the ones that are successful.

In addition, like Mr. Yun, the people who seek out reporters tend to be the ones that have seeking out reporters as part of their job description. When you look at real estate, the average person who is facing foreclosure does not have many "economists" working for them. On the other hand there are literally thousands of people with economics and business degrees working for the other players in the mortgage meltdown. This is why Bear Stearns is a national problem requitring immediate intervention, but the thousands of people losing their homes is just the workings of the market place. This is why regulators step in immediately to help Bear Stearns with almost unanimous approval from economists, while congress will dither for months over finding the right political solution to the problems created by foreclosures for both individuals and communities.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who is to blame for this mess?

There seems to be a lot of discussion to who is to blame for the financial crisis. But an awful lot of the media coverage is highly misleading. Here is synopis: 1) The meltdown in the financial market had little to do with people getting mortgages they couldn't afford. The collapse of the mortgage backed CDO's was caused by the collapse in the value of the houses which provided the collateral. It turned the mortgages behind the "collateralized debt obligations" (CDO's) into mostly un-collateralized debts. The result was that they went from AAA rated bonds to junk. 2)So what caused the housing bubble and collapse? Many people blame the fed, but don't have the story right. The fed did play a role. By keeping interest rates on Treasury Bonds low, they provided a market for alternative bonds that would pay a greater return. But the major cause of the housing bubble was the creativity of the investment banks. These are not the retail banks that make home mortgages ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Stock Market hasn't gone up, the Value of the Dollar has Just Gone Down.

You aren't smarter than the market. It really is that simple. The New York Times had an article about the stock market's recent gains. The story noted that while the market had gone up 11% since the election, the dollar had dropped 10% against a basket of foreign currencies during that same period. They described this as "almost a mirror image." Unfortunately it is exactly a mirror image for people who hold those foreign currencies. Lets say they paid a $100 for a share of stock the day of the election and they exchanged 100 units of their own currency for that $100. Now if they sell that stock they will get $111 dollars, but when they exchange that $111 dollars, they will get back 100 units of their own currency. They have earned nothing, in their own local currency's terms the price hasn't changed. In a world investment market, the price of stock is set by what people around the world are willing to pay for it. Most people are still paying the same pr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Self-Directed Real Estate IRA's the New Scam?

You aren't smarter than the market. It really is that simple. You know the marketing folks have been out talking when the New York Times does a fluff story on some new way to make more money with your investments. So watch out for the new scam promoted by the same media advisers who told you a few years ago to buy the most expensive house a lender would finance. Paul Sullivan story is about people'e successful investment of their retirement money in real estate using a self-directed IRA. He provides us with several "success stories".  Of course they are all recent converters to this idea and, not surprising, all but one of the people whose story Sullivan tells are also in real estate sales. The problem isn't really Paul Sullivan. Its that there is no one who makes money by digging out the horror stories from people who invested their retirement funds in real estate at the height of the housing bubble. There aren't any public relations firms devoted to de...
6 comments
Read more